HOW I LEARNED TO STOP WORRYING AND DIGITIZE MY FILM

If you have a few thousand old slides and negatives left by your parents that you wish to digitize, you have a couple of options to consider.

The first option is taking a hands-on, DIY approach. You may buy/borrow a film scanner or you can use your digital camera. The walkthrough below does not include a film scanner as for one-time project scanner route may have too steep learning curve.  If you opt for camera scanning route, you will need to:

1. Sort and Organize your slides and negatives, discarding any images that aren't worth digitizing.

2. Clean Your Slides and Negatives using a soft brush or compressed air to remove dust or smudges.

3. Set Up Your Equipment, which includes a digital camera with a macro lens, a uniform light source, and a film holder or copy stand.

4. Adjust Your Camera Settings to minimize digital noise, set optimal aperture on lens and set camera to shoot in RAW. Don't worry about correct white balance.

5. Test and Adjust your setup using a test target to check alignment and sharpness across the frame.

6. Digitize Your Slides and Negatives working in manageable batches.

7. Post-Process Your Scanned Images by inverting negatives into positives and performing color correction as needed.

8. Backup and Organize Digitally to ensure the safety and accessibility of your images.

Remember, this is a labor-intensive process, but the reward is the preservation of your family's memories in a digital format. Most likely you will never again look at those pictures so intently as during the scanning.

Your second option is to outsource the job to professional services that specialize in digitizing film negatives and slides. These services handle all aspects of the process, from cleaning the slides and negatives to scanning and post-processing the images. This could be a convenient option if you're short on time or do not wish to invest in the equipment and learning curve associated with the DIY approach.

The costs of both routes can vary. The DIY approach involves an initial outlay for equipment if you don't already own it, plus the time investment. Outsourcing eliminates the need for your own equipment and saves time, but it involves a service fee, which often depends on the number of slides or negatives.

Keep in mind that many professional services offer bulk discounts, so the cost per slide or negative can decrease with larger quantities. Therefore, even with a large collection like yours, outsourcing might be a cost-effective and reasonable solution.

In the end, the choice between DIY and outsourcing depends on your budget, the amount of time you can dedicate to the project, and your comfort level with the process.

From the perspective of a classic film photography purist, here's why one might still opt for digital photography:

1. Instant Gratification: Digital cameras provide immediate feedback. This allows photographers to adjust their technique on the spot and ensures they captured their intended image. This is especially helpful in challenging lighting conditions or fast-moving scenarios.

2. High Volume: Memory cards can store thousands of images, enabling photographers to shoot freely without worrying about running out of film.

3. Post-processing: Digital files can be easily manipulated and enhanced with software, opening a world of creative possibilities that go beyond what's captured in-camera.

4. Cost-effective: After the initial investment, digital photography can be less costly in the long run. No film to buy, no development costs, just the occasional storage upgrade.

5. Ease of Sharing: Digital photos can be shared virtually in an instant, making it easier than ever to connect and engage with others.

6. Advanced Features: Digital cameras often come packed with advanced features like autofocus, in-camera stabilization, and high ISO capabilities, providing additional convenience and flexibility.

7. Environmentally Friendly: Digital photography eliminates the chemical waste produced by film development, making it a more environmentally conscious choice.

Despite the nostalgic allure of film, digital photography can offer a highly efficient, versatile, and creative outlet for contemporary photographers.

Here are the key reasons why one might still shoot film in our digital age:

1. The Aesthetic: Film imparts a unique grain and color palette that adds depth and charm to images, crafting a timeless, authentic look that's hard to mimic digitally.

2. The Process: Shooting film is an art form requiring patience and skill. It's a tangible, hands-on experience that offers a rewarding journey from capturing to developing to sharing the image. 

3. The Challenge: With no option for instant review, film demands careful composition and exposure settings, enhancing your skills as a photographer.

4. Tangibility: A physical print or negative carries an aura that a digital file can't match. There's something magical about holding your memories in your hands.

5. (controversial) Slowing Down: Limited to a certain number of frames per roll, film photography promotes a more mindful, deliberate approach, giving each shot the attention it deserves. While many photographers make this argument, it,s a bit controversial. No one forces digital photographer to be trigger happy. This argument is most likely the substitute for saying that film is too darn expensive these days and most likely will become even more expensive in the future.

6. Classic Gear: Using vintage film cameras can be a joy in itself. These cameras are often conversation starters. They're not just instruments for capturing images; they also act as catalysts for social interactions.

7. Vintage Cool: Using a classic film camera is a style statement. It's a nod to a different era, reflecting an appreciation for craftsmanship and vintage aesthetics.

8. Craftsmanship: Developing your own photos in a darkroom can be a rewarding hands-on experience that combines science and art in a unique way. Even printing quality enlargement in a digital lab still involves a lot of artistic and technical decisions.

To a film photographer, every shot is a creative journey, from the click of the shutter to the moment of revelation in the darkroom. It's an experience that digital simply cannot replicate.

Here's how you can merge the worlds of film and digital photography to get the best of both:

1. Shoot on Film, Process Digitally: Shoot your photos on film to capture the unique grain, color characteristics, and dynamic range that film offers. Then, use a digital camera or a scanner to digitize the negatives. This allows you to edit the images using software, offering great flexibility in terms of color correction, cropping, and other post-processing adjustments.

2. Hybrid Cameras: Consider using hybrid cameras. Some camera manufacturers offer models that combine the design and mechanical features of classic film cameras with a digital sensor. This way, you get the tactile and manual experience of film photography with the convenience of digital.

3. Emulate Film Aesthetics Digitally: You can shoot digitally, but edit your photos to mimic the aesthetic of film. Many editing software options provide presets or tools that emulate the look of various film stocks.

4. Print Digitally Captured Images: Capture images with a digital camera and then create negatives for contact printing using a digital negative process. You can then print from these negatives in a darkroom, combining digital capture with traditional printing techniques.

5. Use Vintage Lenses on Digital Cameras: Using adapters, you can attach vintage film lenses to your digital camera. These lenses often render colors, contrast, and bokeh differently than modern digital lenses, giving your photos a unique look. This works best on mirrorless cameras with Focus Peaking feature.

6. Print Your Images: Whether your images are captured on film or digitally, printing your work is a valuable part of the photographic process. It allows you to hold your work, display it, and truly appreciate it in a different way than viewing it on a screen.

Remember, the goal here is to utilize the strengths of both film and digital to suit your creative vision. It's all about experimenting and finding a workflow that you enjoy and that gives you the results you're after.

Here are the main reasons some photographers have issues with film scanners:

1. Time-Consuming: Scanning film can be a slow process, particularly with high-resolution scans or large quantities of film. Each frame has to be analyzed and captured individually, possibly in number of passes, which can take a considerable amount of time.

2. Quality Variance: The quality of scanners can vary significantly. Lower-end models may not produce the image quality that a photographer seeks, failing to capture the sharp images and proper colors.

3. Complex Workflow: The process of scanning film often has a steep learning curve. Calibrating scamnner, correctly loading the film, selecting the right settings, and handling post-processing tasks can be complex and time-consuming.

4. Maintenance Issues: Dust and scratches on the scanner bed can significantly affect the quality of the scans. Regular cleaning and maintenance are necessary, but can be tedious.

5. Limited Control: Some photographers feel that scanning doesn't offer the same level of creative control as other methods of digitization. While post-production editing can certainly modify the scanned image, factors such as color rendition, contrast, and the look of grain can often be better controlled with other methods, like camera scanning.

6. Cost: High-quality film scanners can be expensive. For photographers who only need to digitize film occasionally, the cost may not be justified.

Despite these potential frustrations, many photographers find that with the right equipment and technique, film scanners can be an effective tool in their workflow. Like any tool, its strengths and weaknesses are to be weighed, and its value depends on the specific needs and preferences of the photographer.

There could be several reasons why some photographers have a hard time accepting digitizing film with a camera. Here are a few potential reasons:

1. Quality Concerns: Some photographers might question the quality of images digitized by a camera compared to those scanned by a dedicated film scanner, which has been specifically designed for the purpose of digitizing film.

2. Workflow Adjustments: Adopting a new technique means changing one's workflow. Photographers might find it challenging to learn new processes, especially if they've been using traditional film scanners for years.

3. Hardware Requirements: Digitizing film with a camera requires specific hardware: a digital camera with sufficient resolution, a macro lens, a light source, and a film holder or copying stand. Some photographers might find the initial setup cost and effort to be a barrier.

4. Software Requirements: After the film has been digitized using a camera, the negatives often need to be converted to positives using software, and color negatives also need color correction. This additional step could be seen as a complication.

5. Time Consumption: While camera scanning can be quicker than using a flatbed scanner once everything is set up, the setup and post-processing might take considerable time, especially in the beginning.

Despite these challenges, many photographers have embraced camera scanning due to its potential benefits such as faster digitizing times (after initial setup), greater control over the process, and the ability to utilize existing photography gear. As with any method, it has its pros and cons, and the best choice depends on individual needs, resources, and preferences.

Here are a few reasons you might want to consider camera digitizing as a method for converting your film negatives into digital images:

1. Speed: Once your setup is in place, camera digitizing can be significantly faster than using a flatbed scanner.  This can save you a lot of time, especially when digitizing large quantities of film.

2. Utilizing Existing Gear: If you already have a decent digital camera and a macro lens, you're well on your way to being able to digitize film. This can be a cost-effective method, especially when compared to the cost of high-end film scanners.

3. The Reliablity: classic film scanners are very complex machines with practically no spare parts available from OEM. The broken scanners are often get fixed by cannibalizing parts from another scanners. You can never be sure that your investment in scanner will keep its value.

4. High Resolution in no time : Digital cameras, especially modern ones, offer very high resolutions. This means you can capture a lot of detail from your negatives, potentially even more than some dedicated film scanners. Though keep in mind that 24 MP or 4000x6000 pixels image contains everything you may want to extract from 35 mm film frame. The higher pixeled images only make sense for larger film formats. 

5. Learning Opportunity: The process of setting up and learning to digitize film with a camera is a valuable educational experience. It helps you understand the characteristics of film and the digital imaging process in a hands-on way.

However, remember that every method has its advantages and disadvantages. What works best for you will depend on your specific needs, budget, the equipment you already own, and how much time you're willing to invest in the process. It's worth exploring all the options and choosing the one that suits you the best.

The cost comparison between camera digitizing and traditional film scanning can vary greatly depending on the equipment used. Let's consider some possible scenarios:

Camera Digitizing Costs: The essential equipment you need for camera digitizing include a digital camera, a macro lens, a copy stand or a similar setup to hold your camera and film steady, a light pad, and a film holder.

• If you already own a digital camera and a macro lens, the cost could be as low as $100 to $200 for a good quality copy stand, light pad, and film holder.

• If you need to purchase a camera and lens, costs can increase significantly. An entry-level digital SLR camera and a macro lens could cost between $500 and $1500, depending on the brand and model.

Film Scanner Costs: Dedicated film scanners come at various price points:

• Entry-level film scanners can start around $100 to $200, but these often offer limited resolution and may not produce the image quality you seek.

• Mid-range film scanners can cost between $200 and $1200. These typically offer better resolution and more advanced features, like automatic dust removal.

• Professional-grade film scanners can run into several thousand dollars. These scanners provide the highest level of image quality and are often used by professionals and institutions.

It's important to note that while the upfront costs are an important consideration, you should also factor in the quality of the results you want to achieve, the time you're willing to invest in the process, and the potential for future upgrades or changes in your setup.